NeXXum

See the connections within your health.

NeXXum was built by a naturopathic doctor to find the root cause of a problem, by reading every test, intake, medication, supplement, appointment note and blood result together rather than one at a time.

NeXXum is the nexus, where the threads of a record meet. NeXXumAI is the engine that reads the record against the library.

The root cause is what the clinician finds. NeXXum shows where to look.

Your health map

Where to look, before you read a single number.

An example person

54 years · 165 cm · 78 kg · postmenopausal

An example health map. Tap an organ, or an item on the right, to see why it is lit.

Health snapshot

Age
54
165 cm · 78 kg
Your age today, with your recorded height and weight.
Body age
48
-5 yrs vs age 53
How old your body's chemistry looks, worked out from nine blood markers and your age.
Heart
4 in 100
10-year heart risk (PREVENT)
Your estimated chance of a heart attack or stroke in the next ten years.
HOMA-IR
4.28
insulin resistance likely
How hard your body is working to keep blood sugar steady, from fasting glucose and insulin on one draw.

Your health map

Loading your body…
Tap a part of the body · drag to turn
  • no results yet
  • results in range
  • a result just outside its range
  • a result outside its range
  • a result far outside its range
Body: MakeHuman base mesh and targets (CC0). Organs: Browne and Schlehlein, Human Reference Atlas / HuBMAP, 3D Reference Organ Set for Female v1.5 (2023), CC BY 4.0.

What's emerging

Your timeline

Now

2023202420252026↑↑↑↑

The timeline shows what came before what, not what caused what. 4 draws on file.

  • 2023
    3/20/2023 · lab results
  • 2024
    3/18/2024 · lab results
  • 2025
    3/17/2025 · lab results
  • 2026
    3/16/2026 · lab results
position 5 of 5

Example people, drawn with NeXXum's own charts and cited ranges.

A snapshot isn't the whole story

Health is longitudinal.

A single result can be difficult to interpret in isolation. NeXXum maps health data across time, making changes, trends and emerging patterns easier to see.

Hemoglobin A1c5.4 → 6 %
0613.85.45.65.86202420252026%
Glucose (Fasting)4.9 → 5.9 mmol/L
1.173.968.734.95.25.55.9202420252026mmol/L
Insulin (Fasting)42 → 98 pmol/L
02018038842587698202420252026pmol/L
Triglycerides1 → 1.6 mmol/L
01.73.9111.21.41.6202420252026mmol/L
HDL Cholesterol1.42 → 1.12 mmol/L
01.32.211.421.331.241.12202420252026mmol/L
Ferritin85 → 94 ug/L
030307667.185928894202420252026ug/L

Example people, drawn with NeXXum's own charts and cited ranges.

Context changes the meaning

The same number is not the same finding.

Three people. One ferritin falling, or looking fine. Three different places to look.

A woman of 34, with heavy periods

  • Woman
  • Age 34
  • Premenopausal
  • Heavy menstrual bleeding
Ferritin48 → 11 ug/L
030307667.1482023-03312024-03192025-03112026-03ug/L
Hemoglobin128 → 118 g/L
631151552071282023-031262024-031212025-031182026-03g/L
Evidence: Ferritin has fallen every year for three years, 48 to 31 to 19 to 11 µg/L (2023-03-20 to 2026-03-16), and now sits below the iron-deficiency level of 30 µg/L, while haemoglobin has drifted down over the same draws; together: iron stores emptying in a woman who records heavy periods.Cause: Most likely menstrual blood loss, recorded as her concern; dietary shortfall possibly contributing; a gastrointestinal source not yet excluded.

A man of 61, no symptoms

  • Man
  • Age 61
Ferritin48 → 11 ug/L
030336733.8482023-03312024-03192025-03112026-03ug/L
Hemoglobin128 → 118 g/L
66.5125170228.51282023-031262024-031212025-031182026-03g/L
MCV86 → 78 fL
5480100126862023-03842024-03812025-03782026-03fL
Evidence: Ferritin 48 to 31 to 19 to 11 µg/L over three years (2023-03-20 to 2026-03-16), below the iron-deficiency level of 30 µg/L, with haemoglobin falling from 128 to 118 g/L over the same draws, in a man with no menstrual loss to explain it; together: iron deficiency anaemia whose source has to be found.Cause: Most likely occult gastrointestinal blood loss, with daily aspirin probably contributing; dietary shortfall possibly contributing; no other source is on this record.

Also reached: Iron deficiency; Helicobacter pylori — test properly, or the negative is manufactured.

A woman of 48, whose ferritin looks fine

  • Woman
  • Age 48
  • Perimenopausal
  • Fatigue
Ferritin52 → 38 ug/L
030307667.1522024-03442025-03382026-03ug/L
C-Reactive Protein4.1 → 12 mg/L
0312.244.12024-038.22025-03122026-03mg/L
Transferrin Saturation14 %
0205089142026-03%
Evidence: Ferritin 52, 44 and 38 µg/L across three yearly draws (2024-03-18 to 2026-03-16), each above the iron-deficiency level but falling, beside a raised C-reactive protein; together: a ferritin held up by inflammation while the stores beneath it fall.Cause: Most likely iron deficiency concealed by inflammation; the driver of the inflammation not yet identified.

Also reached: Fatigue — the exclusions worth doing once (there is no single validated 'fatigue screen'); Perimenopause — stage from the menstrual pattern, not from hormone levels.

Example people, drawn with NeXXum's own charts and cited ranges.

Where things are heading

NeXXum reads direction before a threshold is crossed.

Every marker here is still inside its range. The slope, the drift and the risk readouts say where it is going, and how sure the reading is.

48body agecalendar 53

Your body's age

5 years younger

Your blood reads like 48; the calendar says 53.

Glucose (Fasting) ↑ olderCreatinine ↓ youngerRDW ↓ younger

From your 2026-03-16 blood panel. How is this worked out? ›

PhenoAge (Levine 2018) reads nine blood markers together and asks how old a body with these values usually is. It is an estimate from your blood, not a diagnosis, and it moves when the markers move.

How it is calculated: each of the nine markers is compared with a typical value and weighted by how strongly it predicts mortality (C-reactive protein on a log scale); the weighted sum, with your age, is converted to the age at which those blood values are usual. All nine must come from one blood draw.

  • Albumin43 g/L
  • Creatinine69 µmol/L
  • Glucose (fasting)5.9 mmol/L
  • C-reactive protein2.6 mg/L
  • Lymphocytes28.6 %
  • MCV90 fL
  • RDW13.2 %
  • Alkaline phosphatase72 U/L
  • White blood cells6.3 ×10⁹/L

Your 10-year heart risk

About 4 in 100

Of 100 people with your numbers, about 4 would have a heart or vessel event in the next ten years.

Any heart or vessel event3.6%
Heart attack or stroke2.4%
Heart failure1.2%

AHA PREVENT · from your 2026-03-16 panel. How is this worked out? ›

PREVENT (American Heart Association, 2023) reads your age, sex, cholesterol, blood pressure, kidney function, weight and a few yes/no facts, and says how many of 100 people with the same numbers have a heart or vessel event within ten years. It is an estimate for people aged 30 to 79, not a diagnosis, and it moves when the numbers move.

How it is calculated: your total cholesterol minus HDL (the non-HDL part), your HDL, your systolic blood pressure and your kidney function (eGFR) each enter as a separate term of the AHA 2023 PREVENT equation, with age, sex, diabetes, smoking, blood-pressure medication and statin use; the result is a ten-year probability.

  • Age54
  • Sexfemale
  • Total cholesterol5.6 mmol/L (2026-03-16)
  • HDL cholesterol1.12 mmol/L (2026-03-16)
  • Blood pressure (top number)128 mmHg
  • Kidney function (eGFR)91 (2026-03-16)
  • Body mass index28.7
  • Diabetesnot recorded — counted as no
  • Smokingno
  • Blood-pressure medicationno
  • A statinno

Your insulin-resistance estimate

Your estimate meets the published rule

Read against a rule tested against the reference method, together with your HDL cholesterol.

From your 2026-03-16 blood draw. How is this worked out? ›

HOMA-IR estimates how hard your body is working to keep blood sugar normal. It multiplies your fasting insulin by your fasting glucose from the same blood draw: the more insulin it takes to hold the same sugar, the higher the number. It is an estimate, not a diagnosis, and it is read together with your HDL cholesterol rather than against one fixed cut-off.

How it is calculated: fasting insulin (µU/mL) × fasting glucose (mmol/L) ÷ 22.5

  • Fasting insulin98 pmol/L (2026-03-16)
  • Fasting glucose5.9 mmol/L (2026-03-16)
  • HDL cholesterol1.12 mmol/L (2026-03-16)

The rule it is read against: HOMA-IR > 5.9, or 5.9 ≥ HOMA-IR ≥ 2.8 together with HDL-C < 1.32 mmol/L (51 mg/dL). Meets Tam's clamp-derived classification for insulin resistance (89% sensitivity, 67% specificity in the derivation cohort) — evidence supporting insulin resistance, not a diagnosis; weigh it with glucose, HbA1c, triglycerides and waist.

Source: Matthews DR, et al. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 1985;28(7):412-9 (PMID 3899825). Read against: Tam CS, et al. Defining insulin resistance from hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps. Diabetes Care 2012;35(7):1605-10 (PMID 22511259).

Where each marker is heading

For six of the example's markers, the app's own reading of the trend: how far the value moved across the draws, which way, and whether that movement means anything. Each line is the sentence the app writes on the chart.

a genuine change
larger than the marker's normal variation between two draws of the same person, so it is not noise
not a reliable direction
within that normal variation, so the app will not call it a trend
drifting toward the concerning edge
still inside the healthy range, but moving toward the side where it would stop being healthy
crossing N% of the healthy range
how much of the range the value has travelled; a measure of size, not of harm
  • Hemoglobin A1c 6 % on 2026-03-16

    Rose from 5.4 to 6 % over 3.0 years (4 draws), still in range but drifting toward the concerning edge — larger than this marker's normal variation between draws, so a genuine change.

  • Glucose (Fasting) 5.9 mmol/L on 2026-03-16

    Rose from 4.9 to 5.9 mmol/L over 3.0 years (4 draws), still in range but drifting toward the concerning edge — larger than this marker's normal variation between draws, so a genuine change.

  • Insulin (Fasting) 98 pmol/L on 2026-03-16

    Rose from 42 to 98 pmol/L over 3.0 years (4 draws), still in range but drifting toward the concerning edge — larger than this marker's normal variation between draws, so a genuine change.

  • Triglycerides 1.6 mmol/L on 2026-03-16

    1 → 1.6 mmol/L over 3.0 years (4 draws) — not a reliable direction: across 4 draws the movement does not outrun this marker's own variation between draws.

  • HDL Cholesterol 1.12 mmol/L on 2026-03-16

    Fell from 1.42 to 1.12 mmol/L over 3.0 years (4 draws), worsening from green into yellow — larger than this marker's normal variation between draws, so a genuine change, 1.1× this marker's normal variation between draws.

  • LDL Cholesterol 3.7 mmol/L on 2026-03-16

    Rose from 2.9 to 3.7 mmol/L over 3.0 years (4 draws), worsening from green into yellow — larger than this marker's normal variation between draws, so a genuine change, crossing 24% of the healthy range.

Life-course view

Slide the age to see how these markers' expected ranges shift with time. Women and men differ — pick a tab. Only markers with a cited per-age model are shown.

Age54
  • Anti-Müllerian Hormone0.4–2.1 pmol/L

    expected median ~0.7 at 54 (ovarian reserve declines with age) · Age-stratified AMH nomogram (22,920 women, 2024); decline corroborated by Seifer et al., Fertil Steril 2011

  • FSH25–135 IU/L

    postmenopausal — persistently elevated · Harlow SD, et al. Executive summary of the Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop +10. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(4):1159-68. (PMID 22344196)

  • Estradiol≤ 110 pmol/L

    postmenopausal — low · Harlow STRAW+10 2012 / LifeLabs

  • eGFR≥ 90 mL/min/1.73m²

    ≥90 is normal at any age; expected average ~86 at 54 (falls ~1/yr after 40) · KDIGO; Delanaye 2019

  • TSH0.4–5.4 mIU/L

    upper limit rises with age (young-adult ~3.5 → ~7.5 by 80+) · Surks & Hollowell 2007 (NHANES III)

When the points connect, patterns emerge

The value is in the connections.

Symptoms, lab trends, family history, medications, supplements, lifestyle, genetic risk, imaging and environmental factors. As the record grows, the constellation becomes increasingly interconnected.

SymptomsBiomarkersMedicationsSupplementsFamily historyGeneticsLifestyleEnvironmental factorsImagingBody compositionOther health data

Click any point to see what it is and what it changes

Patterns NeXXum can surface

Six kinds of pattern, each shown on real trend charts.

Lipids, with DXA body composition

  • Woman
  • Age 54
  • Postmenopausal
  • 165 cm
  • 78 kg
  • BMI 28.7

Trajectory shown. Four lipid markers moving together over four years, with body fat rising on DXA, read for her age and menopausal status. Potential area for investigation: atherogenic dyslipidemia.

LDL Cholesterol2.9 → 3.9 mmol/L
03.47.822.92023-033.22024-033.52025-033.92026-03mmol/L
HDL Cholesterol1.3 → 0.95 mmol/L
01.32.211.32023-031.182024-031.052025-030.952026-03mmol/L
Triglycerides1.2 → 2.3 mmol/L
01.73.911.22023-031.52024-031.92025-032.32026-03mmol/L
Apolipoprotein B0.85 → 1.12 g/L
01.052.420.852023-030.942024-031.022025-031.122026-03g/L
Body Fat Percentage33 → 39 %
044.1101.43332023-03352024-03372025-03392026-03%

NeXXum communicates uncertainty rather than forcing every constellation into an answer.

Example people, drawn with NeXXum's own charts and cited ranges.

Before a word is written

The grid is completed first.

Before an assessment is written, every substance on the chart is laid out on a grid of nine points: what it is, what is in it, how it works, what it interacts with, whether it conflicts with the patient's conditions, and the dose. Then the gaps are closed, in order.

  1. 1Our library first

    Each substance is matched against what NeXXum already holds: its cards, Health Canada's licensed products and drug labels, and the evidence already read.

  2. 2Then outside it

    What the library does not hold, the app goes out to find: the open published literature first, and MedlinePlus (public domain) after it. Each source is read whole, checked sentence by sentence, and added to the library for every chart after.

  3. 3Then the questions

    What no source can answer is asked of the clinician: a dose never written down, a product name that cannot be found, whether something is still taken.

Only then is the assessment written. The model is not left to fill a gap with what sounds plausible, or to leave out what it cannot recall.

What the sheet asks, from this example regimen

  • What dose of Metformin is the patient taking? The chart has the drug with no dose recorded.

    A blank dose is not read as unknown by the checks that matter — the dose-ceiling check, the drug-to-lab layer and interaction severity all read this field and each returns nothing rather than a warning. Until it is filled the drug is on the chart without being screened at its own strength.

Measured on the clinic's own charts, 2026-10-02

239 of 244 substances, 84 of 113 conditions, 138 of 179 complaints and 6 of 45 family histories on the clinic's charts already understood from the library and research. What remains open is asked before each chart's next assessment, or stays marked open; nothing the clinician wrote is set aside.

What the clinician receives

The assessment, as the app writes it.

The same example, carried to the end: the findings with their cause, the plan, the next steps and the conclusion. Then the two page letter, and the same case in plain words for the person it is about.

Written by the app on 2026-10-02 for the example man of section 3. Every number in it is checked against the example record by the assessment's own gate.

Assessment

History of present illness.

The example man is a 61-year-old man, BMI 26.5 (overweight by WHO/NIH classification), seen for annual screening. The intake records no complaint: the stated reason for attending is screening alone, and there are no appointment notes, no chief concerns and no care-plan entries on this chart, so this reads as a monitoring panel rather than a presentation for symptoms. What the record does hold is four annual draws, 2023-03-20 through 2026-03-16, and across those four draws three red-cell and iron markers have moved together in one direction. Ferritin has fallen from 48 ug/L on 2023-03-20 to 31 on 2024-03-18, 19 on 2025-03-17 and 11 on 2026-03-16, a slope of about 12.34 ug/L per year over three years and 3.1 times the change it takes for the move to be real. Haemoglobin has gone 128 g/L (2023-03-20), 126 (2024-03-18), 121 (2025-03-17), 118 (2026-03-16), falling about 3.51 g/L per year. MCV has gone 86 fL (2023-03-20), 84 (2024-03-18), 81 (2025-03-17), 78 (2026-03-16), about 2.71 fL per year and 2.1 times the threshold for a real move. Transferrin saturation was measured for the first time on this panel at 12%. Nothing in the record describes fatigue, exertional dyspnoea, altered bowel habit, melaena, rectal bleeding, dyspepsia, weight loss or dysphagia, and the absence of those notes is an absence of recorded history, not a documented negative.

The background that bears on this: the patient has taken aspirin 81 mg daily since 2021-01-15, self-started for prevention, with no atherosclerotic cardiovascular event, revascularisation or coronary calcium score anywhere on this chart, and it is the only agent on the regimen. Alcohol is two drinks a week, there is no smoking, and the patient walks most days. Blood pressure is 132/82 mmHg. The 2026-03-16 panel also carries ALT 24 U/L, CRP 1.1 mg/L, creatinine 86 umol/L, eGFR 84 mL/min/1.73m², fasting glucose 5.1 mmol/L, HbA1c 5.4%, total cholesterol 4.6 mmol/L, LDL 2.8 mmol/L, HDL 1.31 mmol/L, platelets 288 x10⁹/L and TSH 1.9 mIU/L, all within their reference intervals. No family history is recorded, so hereditary contributors cannot be weighed in either direction. Serum iron, TIBC, haematocrit, RBC, RDW, MCHC, reticulocyte count, white cell count and differential, B12 and folate have never been drawn on this patient.

NeXXumAI reorders the objective problem list below before working it: the ranked list puts Helicobacter pylori first and iron deficiency second, but H. pylori is on this chart only because unexplained iron deficiency is a testing indication for it, which makes it one branch of a single investigation rather than a separate problem. The iron-deficiency anaemia is the finding; everything else in the first entry is the search for its cause.


Iron deficiency anaemia in a 61-year-old man, source not establishedCause: Most likely chronic occult gastrointestinal blood loss, with daily low-dose aspirin probably contributing to the rate of loss; coeliac disease, *H. pylori*-associated gastritis, and a gastric or colorectal neoplasm are not yet excluded and are the reason this cannot be treated as a nutritional problem. Dietary insufficiency and malabsorption remain possible but nothing on this record supports either yet.

Numbers:

Ferritin 11 ug/L on 2026-03-16, down from 19 on 2025-03-17, 31 on 2024-03-18 and 48 on 2023-03-20: a fall of 37 ug/L over three years across four draws, about 12.34 ug/L per year, 3.1 times the change required for the move to be real, and now below the WHO threshold of 15 ug/L for depleted iron stores (WHO guideline on use of ferritin concentrations to assess iron status, 2020). Haemoglobin 118 g/L on 2026-03-16, from 121 on 2025-03-17, 126 on 2024-03-18 and 128 on 2023-03-20, a fall of 10 g/L across four draws at about 3.51 g/L per year, and below the WHO cutoff of 130 g/L that defines anaemia in adult men (WHO Nutrition Landscape Information System, anaemia thresholds). MCV 78 fL on 2026-03-16, from 81 on 2025-03-17, 84 on 2024-03-18 and 86 on 2023-03-20, about 2.71 fL per year and 2.1 times the real-change threshold. Transferrin saturation 12% on 2026-03-16, first measurement, below the 20% level at which iron supply to the marrow is inadequate for erythropoiesis (Snook J, Bhala N, Beales ILP, et al. BSG guidelines for the management of iron deficiency anaemia in adults. Gut. 2021;70(11):2030–2051). CRP 1.1 mg/L on 2026-03-16, from 1.3 on 2025-03-17.

Inferred:

Three independent iron parameters are low on the same draw and all three have moved in the same direction over three years, which is the signature of a negative iron balance that has been running long enough to exhaust stores and then to compromise red-cell production. The sequence is mechanistically ordered: ferritin crossed first (into the depleted band on 2025-03-17), then haemoglobin, then MCV most recently on 2026-03-16, which is the expected order when stores deplete before haemoglobin synthesis is restricted and red cells become small (Short MW, Domagalski JE. Am Fam Physician. 2013;87(2):98–104). The low ferritin is interpretable at face value here because CRP is 1.1 mg/L on 2026-03-16: ferritin is an acute-phase protein and inflammation can lift it into the normal range over a true deficiency, which is precisely why transferrin saturation is the confirming test, and in this patient both point the same way (BSG 2021). The patient's BMI of 26.5 matters to that reading rather than being a footnote: adiposity and the metabolic syndrome are a recognised cause of a mildly raised ferritin through low-grade inflammation (Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Ferritin, Serum), so an overweight man with a ferritin of 11 ug/L has nothing in his habitus inflating the number, and the deficiency is if anything understated by it. On the source side, chronic low-dose aspirin, taken daily since 2021-01-15, causes occult gastrointestinal blood loss, and the bleeding harm of aspirin in people without established cardiovascular disease is the central finding of the US Preventive Services Task Force review (Davidson KW, Barry MJ, Mangione CM, et al. JAMA. 2022;327(16):1577-1584). The trap this chart is sitting in is the specific one that aspirin creates: iron deficiency in an older patient on aspirin gets attributed to the drug or to diet, and the anaemia workup, not the aspirin, is what finds a colonic lesion. Age makes the drift harder to dismiss, not easier. Ferritin rises with age in men (Custer 1995, no link on file) and MCV rises with age in adults (Hoffmann JJ, Nabbe KC, van den Broek NM. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015), so both of this patient's trends run against their age-expected direction; only the small haemoglobin decline of later life is partly age-consistent (Beutler & Waalen 2006, no link on file), and a 10 g/L fall to below the WHO male cutoff is more than that explains.

Differential:

A gastric or colorectal neoplasm, kept open by age 61, male sex, and a deficiency that has deepened through four consecutive annual draws rather than stabilised; bidirectional endoscopy is what separates it from the rest, and BSG 2021 states that in men with newly diagnosed iron deficiency anaemia gastroscopy and colonoscopy should generally be the first-line investigations (BSG 2021). Coeliac disease, kept open because it is unexcluded and because BSG recommends coeliac serology in every patient with iron deficiency anaemia; serology with a total IgA to catch the IgA-deficient false negative is what settles it (BSG 2021). H. pylori-associated gastritis, kept open because unexplained iron deficiency is itself a testing indication (Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, Rokkas T, et al. Maastricht VI/Florence consensus. Gut. 2022;71(9):1724–1762); it is separated by a urea breath test or monoclonal stool antigen, and a serology result would not settle it because IgG cannot distinguish current from cleared infection (Chey WD, Howden CW, Moss SF, et al. ACG Clinical Guideline. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024;119(9):1730–1753). Aspirin-induced mucosal injury as the lesion itself, kept open by the 2021-01-15 start date preceding the first ferritin on file; endoscopy discriminates this from a neoplasm and nothing else does. Dietary insufficiency, kept open only because no diet history is recorded. Thalassaemia trait as a coexisting contributor to the microcytosis, kept open because RBC count and RDW have never been drawn, and discriminated by a high RBC with a near-normal RDW and a Mentzer index below 13 (Van Vranken M. Am Fam Physician. 2010;82(9):1117–1122); note that trait is a lifelong fixed microcytosis and cannot account for an MCV that fell from 86 fL on 2023-03-20 to 78 fL on 2026-03-16, so it could only ever be an additional finding here, never the explanation.

Ruled out:

Iron overload and HFE haemochromatosis are excluded by transferrin saturation 12% on 2026-03-16 against the 45% screening cut and ferritin 11 ug/L against the 300 ug/L male level; no genotyping is indicated on these values (EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on haemochromatosis, 2022, https://www.journal-of-hepatology.eu/article/S0168-8278(22)00211-2/fulltext). An inflammation-masked ferritin, and anaemia of chronic disease generally, are excluded by CRP 1.1 mg/L on 2026-03-16 sitting alongside a low ferritin and a low saturation: anaemia of chronic disease is the picture of a normal ferritin with a low saturation, which is not what this panel shows (BSG 2021). Hypothyroidism as a cause of a low ferritin is excluded by TSH 1.9 mIU/L on 2026-03-16 (Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Ferritin, Serum). Chronic kidney disease as the anaemia's driver is not supported, with eGFR 84 mL/min/1.73m² and creatinine 86 umol/L on 2026-03-16. Liver disease is not supported, with ALT 24 U/L on 2026-03-16 and two drinks a week recorded. A macrocytic process, and with it the B12 and folate pathways, is excluded as the dominant mechanism by the MCV direction: folate and B12 deficiency raise MCV, and this one has fallen (Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Folate, Serum).

Does not fit:

The patient is asymptomatic on the intake, with no complaint recorded, which sits a little oddly with three years of progressive iron depletion, although a haemoglobin of 118 g/L on 2026-03-16 is mild and a slow fall of this size is often tolerated without a reported symptom. The smoothness of the decline, four draws each lower than the last, fits a steady low-grade loss better than an intermittently bleeding lesion, though it does not argue against one. Nothing in the social history amplifies the risk: two drinks a week and no smoking remove the two commonest lifestyle contributors to upper GI mucosal injury and to malignancy risk from the picture.

Uncertain:

This record cannot say where the iron is going, and no test on this panel can. The CBC on file is partial: haematocrit, RBC, RDW, MCHC, reticulocyte count, white cell count and differential have never been drawn on this patient, so the reticulocyte response cannot be assessed, the Mentzer discrimination for thalassaemia trait cannot be calculated, and whether a second cell line is involved cannot be evaluated at all, which is the single structural gap in the haematology here. Serum iron and TIBC have never been drawn. No faecal immunochemical test is on file, and that is not a gap worth filling for this purpose: BSG 2021 is explicit that there are insufficient grounds to use FIT to decide who gets scoped in iron deficiency anaemia, so a negative result would not triage this patient out of endoscopy (BSG 2021). If H. pylori testing is pursued, the result is only meaningful with the washout respected, at least 14 days off any proton pump inhibitor and 4 weeks off antibiotics or bismuth, because over-the-counter PPI use manufactures a negative (ACG 2024; 2nd Irish Helicobacter pylori Working Group consensus, 2024). Unknown and answerable by asking rather than by testing: dietary pattern and red-meat intake, any blood donation history, stool colour and bowel habit, dyspepsia, unintended weight loss, any NSAID use beyond the aspirin, any previous endoscopy, and family history of colorectal cancer or coeliac disease.

Reassuring:

The anaemia is mild and normochromic enough to be well tolerated at haemoglobin 118 g/L on 2026-03-16; platelets are 288 x10⁹/L on 2026-03-16, within range, from 262 on 2025-03-17, with no thrombocytopenia and no marrow-failure signal in what has been measured; CRP 1.1 mg/L on 2026-03-16 carries no inflammatory burden; and the iron-overload question has been asked and answered in the safe direction. The modest platelet rise across the two draws is consistent with the mild reactive thrombocytosis that accompanies iron deficiency and is not itself a finding (unsourced read, no citation).

Decision:

The question is not whether this patient is iron-deficient, which three concordant markers on 2026-03-16 settle, but where the iron is being lost, and BSG 2021 answers that with bidirectional endoscopy as first-line in a man with newly diagnosed iron deficiency anaemia, plus coeliac serology with a total IgA, plus properly-timed H. pylori testing (BSG 2021; Maastricht VI, Gut 2022). Completing the blood count with RBC, RDW, haematocrit, reticulocytes and a white cell count and differential, and adding serum iron with TIBC, is what would close the thalassaemia-trait and second-cell-line questions at the same draw.


Daily aspirin with no recorded cardiovascular indication, on a chart that now shows iron deficiency anaemiaCause: Self-started over-the-counter aspirin, taken for prevention since 2021-01-15, on a record that documents no atherosclerotic cardiovascular event, no revascularisation and no coronary calcium score. On what is written down this is primary prevention, and the finding is that the indication has never been established.

Numbers:

Aspirin 81 mg daily, started 2021-01-15. PREVENT 10-year risk as of 2026-03-16: total cardiovascular disease 6.8%, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease 4.1%, heart failure 3.0%. Blood pressure 132/82 mmHg. LDL 2.8 mmol/L on 2026-03-16, from 2.9 on 2025-03-17; total cholesterol 4.6 mmol/L on 2026-03-16, from 4.7 on 2025-03-17; HDL 1.31 mmol/L on 2026-03-16, from 1.28 on 2025-03-17. HbA1c 5.4% on 2026-03-16, from 5.5% on 2025-03-17; fasting glucose 5.1 mmol/L on 2026-03-16, from 5.2 on 2025-03-17. CRP 1.1 mg/L on 2026-03-16. BMI 26.5. Ferritin and haemoglobin trajectories as in Problem 1, both falling across every draw taken while the aspirin has been running.

Inferred:

Two things sit on the same drug. First, the benefit side: the US Preventive Services Task Force found that in people without established cardiovascular disease the bleeding harm largely offsets the cardiovascular benefit, and that the trade worsens with age (Davidson KW, Barry MJ, Mangione CM, et al. JAMA. 2022;327(16):1577-1584). This patient is 61 with a PREVENT 10-year ASCVD estimate of 4.1% as of 2026-03-16, a non-smoker, normotensive-to-borderline at 132/82 mmHg, normoglycaemic at HbA1c 5.4% on 2026-03-16, with an LDL of 2.8 mmol/L on 2026-03-16 that is drifting down rather than up, and a BMI of 26.5 that is the one modifiable driver in that risk estimate. Second, the harm side is no longer theoretical on this chart: chronic low-dose aspirin produces occult gastrointestinal blood loss, and every ferritin on file was drawn with the aspirin running, falling from 48 ug/L on 2023-03-20 to 11 on 2026-03-16. The two halves are linked, which is why this is one problem and not two: the drug is a plausible contributor to Problem 1, and Problem 1 changes the risk-benefit of the drug. Aspirin also raises serum urate at cardioprotective doses by reducing renal urate excretion, only analgesic doses being uricosuric (Caspi D, et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43(1):103-108, no link on file); no urate has ever been drawn on this patient, so that effect is noted for how a future urate would have to be read, not as a finding.

Differential:

Genuinely secondary prevention with the history simply not written down, kept open because the record carries no cardiovascular history section at all and the intake records only that the patient self-started the drug; a direct history of prior myocardial infarction, stroke, angina or revascularisation is what separates this from primary prevention. Subclinical atherosclerosis sufficient to change the calculation, kept open because no coronary calcium score is on file; a calcium score would quantify whether calcified plaque is present, although whether that reclassifies a patient from primary to secondary prevention is a prescriber's judgement and is not settled by the USPSTF statement.

Ruled out:

Familial hypercholesterolaemia is not supported by the lipid value available, LDL 2.8 mmol/L untreated on 2026-03-16 scoring zero on the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria (FH Australasia Network score sheet); that said, the score is a floor rather than a result, because the family-history, personal-vascular-history and physical-examination items have never been recorded, and those are answered by asking and looking rather than by another blood test.

Does not fit:

Aspirin alone is an incomplete explanation for Problem 1 and must not be allowed to close it. The drug has been running since 2021-01-15, well before the first ferritin of 48 ug/L on 2023-03-20, and a steady drug effect does not usually produce a deficiency that deepens year on year through four draws without stabilising. A drug explanation here is a contributor, not a diagnosis, and it is the explanation that most often lets a colonic lesion go unfound.

Uncertain:

Whether there is any cardiovascular event history, bleeding history, or concurrent anticoagulant or NSAID use is not on this record, and all three are answered by asking. No urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio has been drawn, so chronic kidney disease cannot be staged on either of its two axes and the renal contribution to this patient's cardiovascular risk cannot be read; eGFR 84 mL/min/1.73m² on 2026-03-16 looks reassuring but a normal filtration rate does not exclude albuminuric kidney disease, and KDIGO requires persistence over three months on either axis.

Reassuring:

The rest of the cardiometabolic picture is quiet and stable: HbA1c 5.4% on 2026-03-16 from 5.5% on 2025-03-17, fasting glucose 5.1 mmol/L from 5.2, total cholesterol 4.6 mmol/L from 4.7, LDL 2.8 mmol/L from 2.9, HDL 1.31 mmol/L from 1.28, CRP 1.1 mg/L from 1.3, and the patient walks most days and does not smoke.

Decision:

The question is whether this is primary or secondary prevention, because that single fact decides whether the bleeding exposure is justified on a chart that now documents iron deficiency anaemia; a direct history of prior cardiovascular events and revascularisation, and the question of whether plaque imaging is wanted, is what settles it, and it belongs with the prescribing physician as well as with the treating clinician.


Plan

Read the planThe patient arrives on a single agent, aspirin 81 mg daily, and the whole of this plan turns on two linked facts the section above settled: a 61-year-old man is…

The patient arrives on a single agent, aspirin 81 mg daily, and the whole of this plan turns on two linked facts the section above settled: a 61-year-old man is iron-deficient and anaemic with the source unfound, and the drug he is taking is both a plausible contributor to that loss and a drug whose indication was never established. The organising decision is therefore not a bottle at all. It is the investigation that finds where the iron is going, started in parallel with repletion and never instead of it.

Diet and lifestyle

Nutrition.

The intake records nothing under diet, so the first action is a diet history rather than a prescription: red-meat and heme-iron intake, and any vegetarian or vegetarian-leaning pattern, directly bear on Problem 1. Vegetarian men run serum ferritin roughly 61.88 ug/L lower than non-vegetarians in pooled cross-sectional data (Haider LM, Schwingshackl L, Hoffmann G, Ekmekcioglu C. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2018;58(8):1359–1374), which is a difference large enough to matter at a ferritin of 11 ug/L on 2026-03-16. That said, this is an observational association graded C, and the intervention literature is weaker than the association: raising heme-iron intake does not substitute for repletion when stores are this depleted, and in a man of 61 with three concordant iron markers down it would be a serious error to treat this as a dietary problem and stop there. So the diet history answers whether low intake is adding to the loss, and heme-iron-rich meals are worth encouraging as background, but the deficit is corrected pharmacologically and the cause is pursued by investigation.

Movement.

The record states the patient walks most days. That earns its place and should continue. It is also the relevant lever for the one modifiable driver in this patient's cardiovascular risk estimate, the BMI of 26.5, which is overweight by WHO classification and the single input in the PREVENT 10-year ASCVD figure of 4.1% as of 2026-03-16 that is within reach. Modest weight reduction through sustained movement and the diet history above would lower that estimate and, by doing so, weakens the case for carrying an aspirin whose benefit margin is already thin (Davidson KW, Barry MJ, Mangione CM, et al. JAMA. 2022;327(16):1577-1584). No specific prescription is on the record to write against; the measurement is the next in-office weight and blood pressure, currently 132/82 mmHg.

Alcohol.

Two drinks a week is recorded. Nothing on this record calls for an alcohol intervention: that intake is not a contributor to the anaemia, the MCV has fallen rather than risen so alcohol-related macrocytosis is not in the picture, and the ALT of 24 U/L on 2026-03-16 gives no hepatic signal.

Sleep and stress.

The intake records nothing under either, and no finding on this panel points to either, so nothing is called for here.

What comes off

Nothing is stopped today, but aspirin 81 mg daily is put formally in question, and that question is the second half of this plan rather than a throwaway. On what is written down this is primary prevention: self-started for prevention since 2021-01-15, with no atherosclerotic event, no revascularisation and no coronary calcium score anywhere on this chart. The US Preventive Services Task Force found that in people without established cardiovascular disease the bleeding harm largely offsets the cardiovascular benefit and the trade worsens with age (Davidson KW, Barry MJ, Mangione CM, et al. JAMA. 2022;327(16):1577-1584), and this patient is now the exact case that review describes, except that the bleeding harm is no longer hypothetical: every ferritin on file was drawn with the aspirin running, 48 ug/L on 2023-03-20 falling to 11 on 2026-03-16.

⚑ The cost of stopping, and why it waits on a measurement rather than being done now: if there is in fact a prior cardiovascular event the record simply does not carry, this is secondary prevention and withdrawal would raise the risk of a recurrent event. The deciding measurement is a direct cardiovascular history, prior myocardial infarction, stroke, angina or revascularisation, taken from the patient, and that conversation belongs with the prescribing physician as well as the treating clinician. If the history confirms primary prevention, discontinuation is the reasonable course on a chart that now documents iron deficiency anaemia. If plaque imaging is wanted to inform that call, a coronary calcium score quantifies whether calcified atherosclerosis is present, though whether a positive score reclassifies this patient from primary to secondary prevention is a prescriber's judgement and is not settled by the USPSTF statement.

What stays but changes

Nothing currently taken changes in dose, timing or form, because aspirin is the only agent and its decision is a stop-or-keep pending history, not a titration.

What to add

1. Oral iron.

60 to 120 mg elemental iron per dose, once daily or on alternate days, taken before food and separated from tea, coffee and calcium, which inhibit non-haem iron absorption. This answers the confirmed iron-deficiency anaemia of Problem 1: ferritin 11 ug/L, haemoglobin 118 g/L, MCV 78 fL and transferrin saturation 12%, all on 2026-03-16, all moving the same way across four annual draws. Grade A for oral iron correcting iron deficiency (Kamath S, et al. Daily versus alternate day oral iron therapy in iron deficiency anemia. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2024). Because this anaemia is mild and slowly progressive rather than symptomatic or severe, there is no need for the faster haemoglobin response that daily or twice-daily dosing buys, so an alternate-day schedule is the sensible default: it is absorbed at a higher fraction per dose and produces fewer gastrointestinal effects, with no haemoglobin disadvantage at equal total dose (von Siebenthal HK, et al. EClinicalMedicine. 2023). No one formulation is clearly superior (DeLoughery TG, et al. AGA Clinical Practice Update. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024). Set the patient's expectation from the evidence: haemoglobin can rise by about 2 g/dL within two weeks on high-dose oral iron, but ferritin refills slowly, on the order of 0.5 ug/L per week (Casgrain A, et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012), and repletion continues for about three months after the haemoglobin normalises to refill stores. ⚑ Iron is the supplement most worth giving when indicated and the most consequential when it is not, and the discipline here is that repletion runs alongside the source investigation below, not instead of it: iron corrects the number and hides the sign, which is how a colonic lesion is missed (Snook J, Bhala N, Beales ILP, et al. Gut. 2021;70(11):2030–2051). Two housekeeping points: iron binds levothyroxine, quinolones and tetracyclines, none of which are on this regimen but all of which would need dose separation if started, and acute iron overdose is lethal to a small child, which is worth one sentence to any household with tablets and a toddler.

Clinical judgment — reasoning beyond our cited library:

aspirin and oral iron are both gastric irritants, and no vetted interaction row exists for the pair on this chart, so NeXXumAI will not call the combination either safe or interacting. If the patient does not tolerate iron on an empty stomach alongside the aspirin, taking the iron with a little food trades some absorption for tolerability, and that is a reasonable adjustment to make at the bedside. This is a tolerability note, not a sourced interaction.

In what order

Three things move now, in parallel: start oral iron, place the endoscopy referral, and send coeliac serology with total IgA at the same visit. H. pylori testing follows as soon as the PPI and antibiotic washout can be confirmed, so the sequence is set by that window rather than by priority. The additional blood count and iron studies, and the urine ACR, are added to the next requisition rather than drawn today for their own sake. The cardiovascular history is taken at the same appointment and routed to the prescribing physician, and the aspirin decision waits on it. ⚑ Do not let the iron, which will lift the haemoglobin over the coming weeks, become a reason to defer or cancel the endoscopy: the number improving is expected and tells you nothing about the source.

The measurements that close the loop:

haemoglobin and ferritin rechecked after about three months of repletion, Grade A (Snook J, Bhala N, Beales ILP, et al. Gut. 2021), with ferritin expected to climb slowly and haemoglobin faster; if haemoglobin does not respond to adequate iron, that itself points back to an unaddressed source and raises the urgency of the endoscopy. None of ferritin, haemoglobin, MCV or transferrin saturation is re-ordered now, as all four were drawn on 2026-03-16; their next read is the three-month repletion check, booked as the response to starting iron.

Next steps

Read the next steps**Next visit.** Booked for the same appointment at which iron is started and the referral and serology are sent: the purpose of that visit is twofold and both h…

Next visit.

Booked for the same appointment at which iron is started and the referral and serology are sent: the purpose of that visit is twofold and both halves are decisions, not check-ins. First, it is where the direct cardiovascular and bleeding history is taken from the patient, because that single history is what decides whether aspirin 81 mg daily is primary or secondary prevention; a confirmed prior cardiovascular event, revascularisation, or angina tips the decision toward keeping the drug running, and a clean history tips it toward discontinuation being the reasonable course on a chart that now shows iron deficiency anaemia. Second, it is where the diet history (red-meat and heme-iron intake, any vegetarian pattern) and the PPI/antibiotic-use question are taken, since the second gates when H. pylori testing can usefully be sent. Weight and blood pressure (currently 132/82 mmHg) are taken at this same visit as the baseline against which the walking and diet levers are judged.

What to watch between now and then.

Anything suggesting the source of blood loss has become overt rather than occult: melaena, frank rectal bleeding, dark or tarry stool, unintended weight loss, dysphagia, new or worsening dyspepsia, or vomiting. Any of these is a reason to bring the endoscopy referral forward and to contact the treating clinician sooner than the booked visit, rather than waiting for it. On the iron itself, constipation, nausea or dark stool from the supplement are expected and not a reason to stop, but black stool should prompt the patient to say so explicitly rather than assume it is the iron, since it is indistinguishable by appearance from melaena. No symptom is expected to worsen from stopping nothing, since nothing is being withdrawn today.

Next blood panel.

  • Ferritin, haemoglobin, MCV and transferrin saturation: not due now, all four were drawn on this panel (2026-03-16) and are current. Next read at approximately three months after oral iron is started, as the response to repletion; haemoglobin is expected to rise within that window and ferritin to climb more slowly, and a haemoglobin that fails to respond to adequate dosing points back to an unaddressed source and raises the urgency of the endoscopy already referred.
  • Serum iron and TIBC: never drawn on this patient, add at the next requisition to complete the iron picture alongside the three-month repletion recheck. If transferrin saturation is re-run at that draw, the sample should be taken before that day's iron dose, since serum iron rises within minutes of dosing and would overstate iron status drawn after one.
  • RBC, RDW, haematocrit, MCHC and reticulocyte count: never drawn, add at the next requisition to assess the reticulocyte response to repletion and to settle the thalassaemia-trait discrimination (Mentzer index) that cannot currently be calculated.
  • White cell count and differential: never drawn, add at the next requisition; this is the test that closes whether a second cell line is involved, which cannot be evaluated at all on what has been measured so far.
  • Coeliac serology with total IgA: send now, alongside the referral, not deferred to the next panel.
  • H. pylori urea breath test or monoclonal stool antigen: send as soon as the washout is confirmed at the next visit (14 days off any PPI, 4 weeks off antibiotics or bismuth); not sent today because the result would be unreliable without that confirmation.
  • Urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio: never drawn, add at the next requisition to complete the renal picture that eGFR 84 mL/min/1.73m² (2026-03-16) alone cannot settle, bearing on Problem 2's cardiovascular risk read.
  • ALT, creatinine, eGFR, fasting glucose, HDL, HbA1c, LDL, platelets, total cholesterol, CRP, TSH: not due now, all were drawn on 2026-03-16 and are stable against the 2025-03-17 draw; next routine recheck at the standard annual interval unless the cardiovascular history conversation changes the aspirin decision, in which case lipids would be reviewed at that point as part of that discussion rather than on a fixed interval.

Still unanswered.

Where the iron loss is coming from is the central open question, and it is settled only by the bidirectional endoscopy already referred, not by any further blood test. Whether this is primary or secondary cardiovascular prevention is unanswered on the record and is settled by the history taken at the next visit, with a coronary calcium score available if the history is ambiguous and imaging is wanted, though a positive score's bearing on the primary-versus-secondary classification is a judgement for the prescribing physician to make, not something a score resolves on its own. Diet history, blood donation history, bowel habit, any NSAID use beyond the aspirin, prior endoscopy, and family history of colorectal cancer or coeliac disease are all unanswered and are worth taking at the next visit rather than inferring. Chronic kidney disease staging on the albuminuric axis is open pending the urine ACR above. Whether a coexisting thalassaemia trait or a second cell line is in play is open pending the completed blood count above; worth doing at the next requisition, not urgently before it.

Diet and lifestyle levers.

  • Heme-iron and red-meat intake: reviewed at the next visit via the diet history; a pattern of low intake would support encouraging heme-iron-rich meals as background, though this does not change the repletion plan or the referral.
  • Walking (continues as is): reviewed against the next weight and blood pressure reading at the next visit; a falling BMI would lower the PREVENT 10-year ASCVD estimate (4.1% as of 2026-03-16) and strengthen the case for discontinuing aspirin if the history supports primary prevention.
  • Alcohol (two drinks a week): no review triggered, nothing on this record calls for a change.
  • Sleep and stress: no review triggered, nothing recorded and nothing on this panel points to either.

Questions for the patient.

  • Has there been any black, tarry or bloody stool, or any change in bowel habit, that was not previously reported? This is asked before the endoscopy referral is finalised, since a positive answer would make the referral more urgent rather than routine.
  • Any history of heart attack, stroke, angina, stenting or bypass surgery? This single answer decides whether aspirin is primary or secondary prevention and determines whether discontinuation is reasonable to discuss.
  • Any other blood thinner, regular NSAID (including over-the-counter ibuprofen or naproxen), or recent anticoagulant use? This bears on both the bleeding-risk side of the aspirin question and on the differential for the gastrointestinal blood loss itself.
  • Is any proton pump inhibitor or other acid suppressant used, even occasionally and over the counter? This must be answered and the washout (14 days off PPI, 4 weeks off antibiotics or bismuth) confirmed before the H. pylori breath or stool antigen test is sent, or the result risks being a manufactured false negative.
  • What does a typical day of eating look like, particularly red meat or other heme-iron sources, and is there any vegetarian pattern? This is asked before concluding whether dietary intake is contributing to the iron deficiency alongside the GI-loss investigation.
  • Any personal or family history of colorectal cancer or coeliac disease? Neither is on the record, and either would sharpen the urgency and the specific differential being pursued through endoscopy and serology.
  • Has there been any blood donation, recent or regular? This is a cheap discriminating question that could account for part of the ferritin trajectory and is answered by asking rather than by further testing.

Conclusion

This is one process with two expressions rather than two problems that happen to share a chart. A 61-year-old man has moved, over four consecutive annual draws, from adequate iron stores to depleted stores to a microcytic anaemia, in that mechanistic order, with no inflammatory, thyroid, renal or hepatic confounder to soften the reading. In a man of this age that trajectory is chronic occult gastrointestinal blood loss until an endoscopist says otherwise. The daily low-dose aspirin sits inside that same process twice over: it is a plausible contributor to the rate of loss, and it is a drug whose indication was never established on this record, which makes the bleeding exposure it carries harder to justify now that the bleeding is no longer theoretical. The rest of the panel is genuinely quiet, and that quietness is load-bearing rather than incidental, because it is what makes the iron picture interpretable at face value.

The priority is finding the source, and it outranks everything else here on severity and on how narrow the window is. The deficiency has deepened every year rather than stabilised, which is not the behaviour of a dietary or purely drug-related deficit, and the differential that has to be closed includes a gastric or colorectal neoplasm at an age and sex where that possibility is not remote. Repletion is necessary and is being started, but iron corrects the number while leaving the lesion in place, so the referral has to be made now and must not be deferred because the haemoglobin is expected to improve. The aspirin question is important and reversible, and it can wait the length of one conversation; the source question cannot.

The single fact most conspicuously absent is a direct cardiovascular history. If the patient has had a prior myocardial infarction, stroke, angina or revascularisation that simply was never written down, the aspirin becomes necessary treatment and the task shifts to managing its bleeding cost alongside the gastrointestinal workup. If the history is clean, this is primary prevention in a man who is now anaemic from occult blood loss, and withdrawal becomes the reasonable course to put to the prescribing physician. Either answer reframes the drug entirely, and neither answer changes the need for the endoscopy.

The first action is to place the bidirectional endoscopy referral, with oral iron started and coeliac serology sent at the same visit.

Every number traced to the record. Every flagged marker addressed. Every citation read against its paper. Every date verified.

The two page letter, as the app lays it out

Conclusion

This is one process with two expressions rather than two problems that happen to share a chart. A 61-year-old man has moved, over four consecutive annual draws, from adequate iron stores to depleted stores to a microcytic anaemia, in that mechanistic order, with no inflammatory, thyroid, renal or hepatic confounder to soften the reading. In a man of this age that trajectory is chronic occult gastrointestinal blood loss until an endoscopist says otherwise. The daily low-dose aspirin sits inside that same process twice over: it is a plausible contributor to the rate of loss, and it is a drug whose indication was never established on this record, which makes the bleeding exposure it carries harder to justify now that the bleeding is no longer theoretical. The rest of the panel is genuinely quiet, and that quietness is load-bearing rather than incidental, because it is what makes the iron picture interpretable at face value.

The priority is finding the source, and it outranks everything else here on severity and on how narrow the window is. The deficiency has deepened every year rather than stabilised, which is not the behaviour of a dietary or purely drug-related deficit, and the differential that has to be closed includes a gastric or colorectal neoplasm at an age and sex where that possibility is not remote. Repletion is necessary and is being started, but iron corrects the number while leaving the lesion in place, so the referral has to be made now and must not be deferred because the haemoglobin is expected to improve. The aspirin question is important and reversible, and it can wait the length of one conversation; the source question cannot.

The single fact most conspicuously absent is a direct cardiovascular history. If the patient has had a prior myocardial infarction, stroke, angina or revascularisation that simply was never written down, the aspirin becomes necessary treatment and the task shifts to managing its bleeding cost alongside the gastrointestinal workup. If the history is clean, this is primary prevention in a man who is now anaemic from occult blood loss, and withdrawal becomes the reasonable course to put to the prescribing physician. Either answer reframes the drug entirely, and neither answer changes the need for the endoscopy.

The first action is to place the bidirectional endoscopy referral, with oral iron started and coeliac serology sent at the same visit.

Assessment

  • Iron deficiency anaemia in a 61-year-old man, source not established

    Most likely chronic occult gastrointestinal blood loss, with daily low-dose aspirin probably contributing to the rate of loss; coeliac disease, *H.

  • Daily aspirin with no recorded cardiovascular indication, on a chart that now shows iron deficiency anaemia

    Self-started over-the-counter aspirin, taken for prevention since 2021-01-15, on a record that documents no atherosclerotic cardiovascular event, no revascularisation and no coronary calcium score.

Page 1 of 2 · NeXXum identifies patterns for a clinician to interpret.

Plan

  • Diet and lifestyle

    Nutrition. The intake records nothing under diet, so the first action is a diet history rather than a prescription: red-meat and heme-iron intake, and any vegetarian or vegetarian-leaning pattern, directly bear on Problem 1.

  • What comes off

    Nothing is stopped today, but aspirin 81 mg daily is put formally in question, and that question is the second half of this plan rather than a throwaway.

  • What stays as it is

    Aspirin stays running only until that indication question is answered, for the reason just given.

  • What stays but changes

    Nothing currently taken changes in dose, timing or form, because aspirin is the only agent and its decision is a stop-or-keep pending history, not a titration.

Next steps

  • Next blood panel.

    Ferritin, haemoglobin, MCV and transferrin saturation: not due now, all four were drawn on this panel (2026-03-16) and are current.

  • Diet and lifestyle levers.

    Heme-iron and red-meat intake: reviewed at the next visit via the diet history; a pattern of low intake would support encouraging heme-iron-rich meals as background, though this does not change the repletion plan or the referral.

  • Questions for the patient.

    Has there been any black, tarry or bloody stool, or any change in bowel habit, that was not previously reported?

Page 2 of 2 · NeXXum identifies patterns for a clinician to interpret.

The same case, in plain words, as the person reads it

Your blood tests show you are low on iron, and your blood count is a little low too, which usually means iron-deficiency anaemia. The key question is where that iron is going, and the plan is to find the source while you also build your iron back up with iron tablets. Your low-dose aspirin, which you started on your own, may be adding to a slow blood loss, so your team wants to check whether you truly need it. The good news is that your liver, kidney, thyroid, blood sugar and cholesterol numbers all look steady and give no cause for concern.

Your iron is low and it's been slipping for years

What we found

Three different iron and blood tests all point the same way, and all have been drifting down for three years. Your ferritin, which is your iron store, is 11 ug/L on 2026-03-16. It was 19 a year before, 31 the year before that, and 48 in 2023. Your transferrin saturation, which shows how much iron is reaching your blood-making factory, is 12% on 2026-03-16. Your hemoglobin, the part of blood that carries oxygen, is 118 g/L on 2026-03-16, down from 121, 126 and 128 in earlier years. Your red blood cells have also grown smaller, with an MCV of 78 fL on 2026-03-16, down from 86 in 2023. When all three move together like this, it means your body has been losing iron faster than it takes in for a long time. The most likely reason is slow, hidden bleeding in your gut, and your daily low-dose aspirin may be adding to that loss. Other possible causes, like coeliac disease, a stomach infection, or a growth in the stomach or bowel, have not been ruled out yet. That is why this can't just be treated as a food problem.

Why it matters

Low iron leaves you short of the oxygen-carrying part of your blood, which can make you tired and run-down. But the bigger reason this matters is the cause. In a man of 61, iron loss like this is treated as hidden bleeding in the gut until proven otherwise. Taking iron will lift your numbers, but it can also hide the warning sign while the real source goes unchecked. That is why finding the source matters as much as fixing the iron.

What's reassuring

The anaemia is mild and your body seems to be tolerating it well. Your inflammation marker (CRP 1.1 mg/L on 2026-03-16) is low, so nothing is masking the true picture. Your platelets are normal at 288 on 2026-03-16, with no sign of a problem in how your blood is made. Iron overload was checked and ruled out in the safe direction. Your thyroid, kidney and liver tests give no sign of being the cause.

What to do

Start iron by mouth: 60 to 120 mg of elemental iron per dose, as a ferrous salt or bisglycinate, once daily or every other day. Take it before food and keep it apart from tea, coffee and calcium, which block absorption. Every-other-day dosing is a sensible default here, since it is absorbed better per dose and causes fewer gut side effects. Expect your hemoglobin to rise within a couple of weeks, but your iron stores refill slowly, so keep going for about three months after hemoglobin is back to normal. Constipation, nausea or dark stool from the iron are expected and not a reason to stop, but if your stool turns black, say so rather than assume it's the iron, since it can look the same as bleeding. Just as important: iron runs alongside the search for the source, never instead of it. Your plan is to place a referral for a camera test of both your stomach and bowel, send a coeliac blood test with a total IgA at the same visit, and test for a stomach infection once you've confirmed you've been off any acid-reducing medicine for 14 days and off antibiotics or bismuth for 4 weeks. Serum iron, TIBC, and a fuller blood count (including RBC, RDW, haematocrit, MCHC, reticulocytes, and a white cell count) go on your next lab slip. Recheck hemoglobin and ferritin after about three months of iron. If your hemoglobin doesn't respond, that points back to an unaddressed source and makes the camera test more urgent. Don't let an improving number become a reason to cancel that test. Also watch for black or tarry stool, frank bleeding, weight loss you didn't plan, trouble swallowing, or new or worse indigestion between now and your next visit, and contact your clinician sooner if any show up.

Your daily aspirin has no clear reason on file — and it may be adding to your low iron

What we found

You started taking aspirin 81 mg daily on your own on 2021-01-15, to prevent heart trouble. But your record shows no past heart attack, no stroke, no stent or bypass, and no scan of your heart arteries. On what is written down, you are taking it to prevent a first event, not a repeat one — and no one ever confirmed you needed it. Meanwhile, your rest of your heart picture is quiet and steady. Your LDL cholesterol is 2.8 on 2026-03-16, down from 2.9 the year before. Your total cholesterol is 4.6, down from 4.7. Your HDL is 1.31, up from 1.28. Your blood sugar marker is 5.4%, down from 5.5%, and your fasting sugar is 5.1, down from 5.2. Your blood pressure is 132/82. You walk most days and you don't smoke. Your 10-year estimated risk of a heart-artery event is 4.1%.

Why it matters

Aspirin thins the blood. For someone who has never had a heart event, the benefit is usually small and the main cost is slow, hidden bleeding — often from the gut. On your chart that cost is not just a theory: every ferritin reading was taken while you were on the aspirin, and it fell from 48 on 2023-03-20 to 11 on 2026-03-16. So the aspirin is a likely part of why your iron is low. That is why this is tied to your iron problem and not a separate issue. The one thing that decides whether this aspirin is worth keeping is a simple question: have you ever had a heart attack, stroke, chest pain from the heart, a stent, or bypass surgery? If yes, the aspirin is protecting you and should stay. If no, stopping it becomes the reasonable move, since your chart now shows low-iron anemia. That answer is not in your record — it is open, and it is settled by asking you, not by a test.

What's reassuring

Your cholesterol, blood sugar, and inflammation numbers are all in range and holding steady or improving year to year. You walk most days and don't smoke. Nothing is being stopped today, so you won't lose any protection while this question gets answered. Your weight is in the overweight range (body mass is 26.5), and that is the one piece you can move — losing a little through walking and diet would lower your heart-risk estimate.

What to do

Nothing changes today — the aspirin keeps running until the question is answered. At your next visit, you'll be asked directly about any past heart attack, stroke, chest pain, stent, or bypass, and about any bleeding history or other blood thinners you take. A clean history makes stopping the aspirin reasonable; a confirmed past event means it stays. This decision goes to the doctor who can prescribe, together with your treating clinician. If you and they want more information, a scan of your heart arteries can show whether there is hardened plaque, though whether that changes the aspirin decision is the prescribing doctor's call. Keep walking most days — a lower weight would lower your risk estimate and strengthen the case for stopping the aspirin if your history is clean. Your weight and blood pressure will be taken at that visit as a starting point.

Since the last assessment

Silence is not resolution.

What was a problem last time is answered this time, from the numbers.

As the clinician reads it

Of the 2 problems raised on 4/2/2025, compared against the results drawn 3/16/2026: 0 improved, 1 worse, 1 unchanged, 0 with no new data, 0 not gradable by a number. A problem leaves this list only by being graded, never by going quiet.

LDL cholesterol drifting up

Worse.

Not raised in this assessment.

  • LDL Cholesterol 3.4 mmol/L on 3/17/2025 (green) to 3.7 mmol/L on 3/16/2026 (yellow): worse, zone green to yellow.
  • Apolipoprotein B: no new data, not redrawn since the last assessment.

Fasting insulin and triglycerides rising together

Unchanged.

Raised again in this assessment.

  • Insulin (Fasting) 76 pmol/L on 3/17/2025 (green) to 98 pmol/L on 3/16/2026 (green): unchanged, inside the healthy range throughout.
  • Triglycerides 1.4 mmol/L on 3/17/2025 (green) to 1.6 mmol/L on 3/16/2026 (green): unchanged, inside the healthy range throughout.
  • HDL Cholesterol 1.24 mmol/L on 3/17/2025 (yellow) to 1.12 mmol/L on 3/16/2026 (yellow): unchanged, within measurement noise, same zone.

As the person reads it

3 things have changed since your last update

compared with your assessment of 2025-04-02

  • HDL Cholesterol moved the wrong way, 1.42 to 1.12 mmol/L
  • LDL Cholesterol moved the wrong way, 3.4 to 3.7 mmol/L

Underneath the constellation

Every connection rests on a clinical library.

NeXXum is not AI reading blood work. NeXXumAI reads the record against a library researched and built by clinicians, and checked against the published evidence.

NeXXumAI
Disease patterns

Cited patterns across every specialty, each defined by the results that raise it, for a clinician to interpret.

Marker ranges

Cited ranges for each marker by sex, age and cycle phase, and the level where a result changes meaning.

Supplements and botanicals

Graded by the strength of the evidence, with studied doses and cautions, and a record of what does not work.

Pharmaceuticals

Drug classes and their known effects on lab results, so a change caused by a medication is read as one.

Interactions and products

Interactions between medications and supplements, and licensed Canadian products down to their ingredients.

Updated literature

Every night NeXXumAI reads the newly published articles that bear on what the library holds, and proposes what they change.

Measured on 2026-10-02

  • 370 condition cards across 19 clinical domains
  • 338 marker cards
  • 241 treatments with graded, cited indications
  • 29 to 50 articles read a night over the last 8 nights

Coverage, measured on every assessment written

92% of the record accounted for: 5,670 of 6,142 items across 200 assessments; 74 dropped nothing.

What the nightly reading proposed to change

118 refused · 260 held · 105 applied. A paper changes a card only when a second reading agrees.

A marker's natural swing, on its card

Glucose (Fasting): a repeat draw must differ by 14% to mean anything (within-subject biological plus analytical variation, Ricós/EFLM). A smaller move is noise, and the app says so.

Not yet judgeable, and why

Every assessment ends its findings with what the record cannot answer and the test that would: a question is written as a question, never as a finding.

When the evidence exists, NeXXum uses it. When it doesn't, NeXXum says so rather than filling the gap.

One constellation, two perspectives

The same record, read for the person and for the clinician.

For individuals

Understand your health over time.

Turn years of health information into a picture you can actually understand.

  • · Longitudinal trends
  • · Changes in your biomarkers
  • · Symptoms and health patterns
  • · Context
  • · Greater visibility into your own health story
  • · Questions and areas to discuss with your healthcare provider

For clinicians

See the clinical picture at a glance.

NeXXum helps clinicians move from fragmented data to a more connected view of the patient, surfacing patterns and relationships that may otherwise be difficult to see.

  • · Longitudinal trends
  • · Pattern identification
  • · Interactions between domains
  • · Relevant risk factors
  • · Potential differentials
  • · Possible contributing factors
  • · Medication and supplement context
  • · Evidence and source traceability
  • · Areas warranting further investigation
  • · Clinical decision support

The clinician remains responsible for interpretation and clinical decision making.

Connect the data. See the patterns. Understand the whole picture.